Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyrick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyrick, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What is Good Qualitative Research?

A First Step towards a Comprehensive Approach to Judging Rigour/Quality

Jane Meyrick

Public Health Specialist and Research Consultant, UK, jane.meyrick{at}orange.net

Qualitative research has an enormous amount to contribute to the fields of health, medicine and public health but readers and reviewers from these fields have little understanding of how to judge its quality. Work to date accurately reflects the complexity of the theoretical debate required but may not meet the needs of practitioners attempting to apply qualitative work in reviews of evidence. This article describes a simple, practitioner-focused framework for assessing the rigour of qualitative research that attempts to be inclusive of a range of epistemological and ontological standpoints. An extensive review of the literature, contributions from expert groups and practitioners themselves lead to the generation of two core principles of quality: transparency and systematicity, elaborated to summarize the range of techniques commonly used, mirroring the flow of the research process. The complexities discovered are only summarized here. Finally, outstanding issues such as ‘how much transparency is enough?’, are flagged up.

Key Words: evidence base • qualitative research • quality

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 799-808 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1359105306066643
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
B. Stige, K. Malterud, and T. Midtgarden
Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 1504 - 1516.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
S. A. Taylor
Engaging and Retaining Vulnerable Youth in a Short-term Longitudinal Qualitative Study
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 391 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
D. Harcourt and H. Frith
Women's Experiences of an Altered Appearance during Chemotherapy: An Indication of Cancer Status
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2008; 13(5): 597 - 606.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
C. Putland
Lost in Translation: The Question of Evidence Linking Community-based Arts and Health Promotion
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2008; 13(2): 265 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]