This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Somerfield, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Somerfield, M. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Utility of Systems Models of Stress and Coping for Applied Research

The Case of Cancer Adaptation

Johns Hopkins University, USA

Contemporary conceptual models of stress and coping are intricate systems formulations that depict adaptation as a dynamic, interactional process. The inherent complexity of these models presents conceptual and methodological challenges that make testing a complete model difficult. This article makes the case for a more microanalytic strategy for applied coping research that, by centering attention and available resources on selected high-frequency, high-stress problems, permits more conceptually sophisticated and clinically informative analyses. In this context, the prevailing conceptual models have heuristic value for organizing the holistic study of adaptational processes. The utility of the proposed strategy for the development of problem-specific systems models is illustrated using the example of treatment-induced sterility from research on cancer adaptation.

Key Words: coping • neoplasms • stress, systems

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 133-151 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/135910539700200202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. Somerfield and L. A. Fogarty Commentary on Siegel and Schrimshaw's 'Coping with negative emotions: The cognitive strategies of HIV-infected gay/bisexual men' J Health Psychol, January 1, 2001; 6(1): 121 - 124. [PDF]

				K. Siegel and E. W. Schrimshaw Coping with Negative Emotions: The Cognitive Strategies of HIV-infected Gay/Bisexual Men J Health Psychol, July 1, 2000; 5(4): 517 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Danoff-Burg, J. Ayala, and T. A. Revenson Researcher Knows Best?: Toward a Closer Match between the Concept and Measurement of Coping J Health Psychol, March 1, 2000; 5(2): 183 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Somerfield, J. Sloan, and C. Loprinzi Wherefore Global Quality-of-Life Assessment? J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 730 - 730. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T.D. De Ridder, K. M.G. Schreurs, and J. M. Bensing Adaptive Tasks, Coping and Quality of Life of Chronically Ill Patients: The Cases of Parkinson's Disease and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome J Health Psychol, January 1, 1998; 3(1): 87 - 101. [Abstract]