Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Britton, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lavin, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Britton, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lavin, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ambiguity of Monogamy as a Safer-sex Goal Among Single, Pregnant, Inner-city Women

Monogamy by Whose Definition?

Paula J. Britton

John Carroll University, Cleveland, OH, USA

Oneida H. Levine

Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, USA

Anita P. Jackson

Kent State University, USA

Stevan E. Hobfoll

Kent State University, USA

James B. Shepherd

Kent State University, USA

Justin P. Lavin

Akron City Hospital, USA

We examined the ambiguity of monogamy as a safer-sex goal in a sample of young, inner- city women (N = 447), of whom 58 percent were African- American and 42 percent European-American. It was our premise that women may be misperceiving and underestimating their risk due to differences in their definition and beliefs about monogamy, and thus are not changing their behavior. When compared to long-term monogamous women (self-reporting one partner in the past year), serially monogamous women (reporting two or more partners in the past year) perceived themselves at greater risk but did not report more frequent use of condoms. It is possible that a suggestion of monogamy may be subject to multiple interpretations and thus could be providing women with a false sense of safety. Risk reduction should be defined in specific behavioral terms.

Key Words: HIV/AIDS prevention • HIV/ AIDS risk • inner-city women, monogamy • safer sex

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 227-232 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/135910539800300206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?