Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, B. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lay Representations of Genetic Disease, and Predictive Testing

Bethan J. Henderson

School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, UK

Bryan T. Maguire

School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, UK

As research in human genetics advances, genes for familial forms of cancer and heart disease will continue to be identified. The implication of such findings is that at-risk individuals will be offered a predictive genetic test. How do individuals make such decisions and what information do they need to make informed choices? Richards (1993) has argued that the first step in understanding and helping people to make these decisions is to investigate lay beliefs of genetics. This study examined illness representations of genetic disease, and predictive testing in a sample of 20 educated lay people. Through content analysis of open-ended interviews, we discovered that individuals have limited knowledge of late-onset genetic disorders and predictive testing. Most of the sample identified genetic diseases that manifest in childhood, and were more familiar with prenatal testing. They did not mention any treatment options for genetic disorders, which may indicate that lay people are more deterministic about diseases with a genetic component. Finally, they consistently raised concerns about the ethics of genetic testing and research. The implications of our findings for the provision of information in a genetic testing situation are discussed.

Key Words: genetic disease • genetic testing, illness representations

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 233-241 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/135910539800300207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. C. Sanderson, J. Wardle, and S. Michie
The effects of a genetic information leaflet on public attitudes towards genetic testing
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 213 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
J. S. Shaw III and K. L. Bassi
Lay Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Inherited Diseases
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2001; 6(4): 405 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]