This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schofield, M. J. Articles by Mishra, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schofield, M. J. Articles by Mishra, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validity of the SF-12 Compared with the SF-36 Health Survey in Pilot Studies of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health

University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

Gita Mishra

University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

This study assessed the relative validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36 and SF-12) for Australian women and compared norms for the independently administered and embedded SF- 12. Two samples of women in New South Wales were randomly selected from the Medicare database ( N = 3600). The sample was stratified into young (18 to 22 years), middle-aged (45 to 49 years) and older (70 to 74 years) women, and into women living in urban (40 percent), rural (30 percent) and remote (30 percent) areas. In study 3500 households were selected by random digit dial. The method was a mailout survey. SF-36 scale scores were similar to US norms. For the older group, health profiles of the independent and embedded SF- 12 differed. For the SF-36 and independently administered SF- 12, means differed in all three age groups. The SF-12 physical health scores discriminated between women with poor versus good physical health, and mental health scores discriminated between groups who were or were not psychologically distressed on GHQ-12. The SF- 36, relative to the SF-12, appears to be a more reliable measure for examining changes in health status over time and between groups.

Key Words: mental health • physical health, quality of life • SF-12 • SF-36, validity • women's health

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 259-271 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/135910539800300209


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J Muller-Nordhorn, S Roll, and S N Willich Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease Heart, May 1, 2004; 90(5): 523 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Drebing, E. A. Van Ormer, R. K. Schutt, C. Krebs, M. Losardo, C. Boyd, W. Penk, and R. Rosenheck Client Goals for Participating in VHA Vocational Rehabilitation: Distribution and Relationship to Outcome Rehabil Couns Bull, April 1, 2004; 47(3): 162 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]