This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Benveniste, J. Articles by Hepworth, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Benveniste, J. Articles by Hepworth, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lay Theories of Anorexia Nervosa

A Discourse Analytic Study

Randwick, NSW, Australia

Amanda Lecouteur

Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide, South Australia

Julie Hepworth

Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia

Previous studies on lay theories of anorexia nervosa have examined the ‘accuracy’ of lay knowledge, and the identification of factors by family and friends that would encourage early interventions (Huon, Brown, & Morris, 1988, 7, 239–252; Murray, Touyz, & Beumont, 1990, 9, 87–93). In contrast to these approaches, we examine lay theories of anorexia nervosa using a critical psychology perspective. We argue that the use of a discourse analysis methodology enables the examination of the construction of lay theories through dominant concepts and ideas. Ten semi-structured interviews with five women and five men aged between 15 and 25 years were carried out. Participants were asked questions about three main aspects of anorexia nervosa: aetiology, treatment and relationship to gender. Each interview was analysed in terms of the structure, function and variability of discourse. Three discourses: sociocultural, individual and femininity, are discussed in relation to the interview questions. We conclude that, in this study, lay theories of anorexia nervosa were structured through key discourses that maintained a separation between sociocultural aspects of anorexia nervosa and individual psychology. This separation exists in dominant psychomedical conceptualizations of anorexia nervosa, reinforcing the concept that it is a form of psychopathology.

Key Words: anorexia nervosa • critical psychology • discourse analysis • lay theories

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 59-69 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135910539900400110


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Grogan Body Image and Health: Contemporary Perspectives J Health Psychol, July 1, 2006; 11(4): 523 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Burns Eating Like an Ox: Femininity and Dualistic Constructions of Bulimia and Anorexia Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2004; 14(2): 269 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Furnham and C. Buck A Comparison of Lay-Beliefs about Autism and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder International Journal of Social Psychiatry, December 1, 2003; 49(4): 287 - 307. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Giles Narratives of Obesity as Presented in the Context of a Television Talk Show J Health Psychol, May 1, 2003; 8(3): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]