Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Deconstructing Conceptualizations of ‘Adjustment’ To Chronic Illness

A Proposed Integrative Framework

This article reviews the literature on ‘adjustment’ to chronic illness in general, and end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in particular, and discusses some of the inherent problems. A major limitation of published studies has been their arbitrary, fragmented and inconsistent conceptualization of ‘adjustment’. The construct has typically been viewed in terms of a return to ‘normal’ social roles (e.g., work), an absence of psychiatric ‘caseness’ (e.g., on depression) or ‘compliance/ adherence’ with treatment. Few, if any, studies have considered the conceptualizations of patients, partners and/or professional caregivers. The present study investigates conceptualizations of ‘adjustment’ amongst end-stage renal failure (dialysis-dependent) patients, their partners and home dialysis nurses. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 CAPD (continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis) patients, 5 partners/relatives and 3 home dialysis sisters. The findings are outlined in terms of the categories identified in the interviews, focusing on ‘adopting a new approach to being and living’. The relation between emerging categories and active vs. resigned acceptance is also discussed. In conclusion, the themes associated with ‘active’ acceptance are highlighted and directions for further research are outlined.

Key Words: acceptance • adaptation • adjustment • chronic illness

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 259-272 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135910539900400219
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NDT PlusHome page
J. Low, G. Smith, A. Burns, and L. Jones
The impact of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on close persons: a literature review
NDT Plus, April 1, 2008; 1(2): 67 - 79.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rehabil Couns BullHome page
M. Bishop
Quality of Life and Psychosocial Adaptation to Chronic Illness and Disability: Preliminary Analysis of a Conceptual and Theoretical Synthesis
Rehabil Couns Bull, July 1, 2005; 48(4): 219 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
P. Nicolson and P. Anderson
The Psychosocial Impact of Spasticityrelated Problems for People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus Group Study
J Health Psychol, September 1, 2001; 6(5): 551 - 567.
[Abstract] [PDF]