This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smedslund, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Smedslund, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Pragmatic Basis for Judging Models and Theories in Health Psychology: The Axiomatic Method

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Psychology and its subfield of health psychology suffer from a lack of standardized terminology and a unified theoretical framework for the prediction and explanation of health behaviour. Hence, it is difficult to establish whether a given theory is logically consistent and to compare different theories. Science involves both empirical and conceptual issues. It is asserted that psychology has overemphasized the former and underemphasized the latter. Empirical psychology needs an explicit, shared conceptual system in order to develop its theories. An example of an axiomatic method (Psycho-Logic; see e.g. J. Smedslund.Psychological Inquiry 1991a; 2: 325–338) is applied to show how the Health Belief Model,the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Social Cognitive Theory all conform to the a priori conditions of acting. One implication is that studies of the predictive power of theories stated as definitional truths only assess auxiliary hypotheses, i.e. the extent to which the measuring instruments are reliable and valid. On the other hand, the introduction of logic into health psychology can facilitate genuine empirical studies by helping to avoid so-called ‘pseudoempirical’ work (Smedslund, J. In Smith, Harré & Van Langenhove (Eds.) Rethinking psychology, 1995). Systems such as Psycho-Logic can also enhance conceptual integration by using logic to explicate and demonstrate intuitive relations. Implications for practitioners are discussed briefly.

Key Words: axiomatic method • health belief model • psychologic • social cognitive theory • theoretical psychology • theory of planned behaviour

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 133-149 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/135910530000500202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Trafimow The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Case Study of Falsification in Psychology Theory Psychology, August 1, 2009; 19(4): 501 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. F. Marks The Quest for Meaningful Theory in Health Psychology J Health Psychol, November 1, 2008; 13(8): 977 - 981. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Noar and R. S. Zimmerman Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2005; 20(3): 275 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Glanz and J. Maddock On Judging Models and Theories: Research and Practice, Psychology and Public Health J Health Psychol, March 1, 2000; 5(2): 151 - 154. [PDF]