This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smedslund, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Smedslund, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Psycho-Logic: A ‘Conceptual Toolbox’ and ‘Mind Sharpener’ for Health Psychologists: A Response to Commentaries

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

This is a reply to K. Glanz, J. Maddock, J. O. Prochaska, D. Seedhouse, and H. Stam on the target article entitled: ‘A pragmatic basis for judging models and theories in health psychology: the axiomatic method’. I defend the claim that one should only test hypotheses that are empirical and avoid testing hypotheses that are necessarily true because of conceptual relations and logic. I argue that the axiomatic system Psycho-Logic (PL) should be added to the other methods which form the health psychologist's methodological ‘toolbox’.

Key Words: axiomatic method • Health Belief Model • Psychologic • Theory of Planned Behavior • Transtheoretical model

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 165-171 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/135910530000500207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Noar and R. S. Zimmerman Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2005; 20(3): 275 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]