This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stam, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stam, H. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Theorizing Health and Illness: Functionalism, Subjectivity and Reflexivity

University of Calgary, Canada

Health and illness in contemporary psychology are remarkably undertheorized, with the consequence that implicit definitions of these topics are unquestionably imported into health psychology. Largely inspired and oriented to the medical system, health psychology is often subservient to biomedically inspired theory or directed to solving the problems of the health care system, not those of its patients or those who might ultimately benefit from health knowledge. Qualitative approaches have attempted to reintroduce the voice of the patient/sufferer/individual back into health psychology but without adequate theoretical integration this work has been marginalized and ignored by mainstream health psychology in the service of medical modelling. The point is not to develop a health psychology as an exclusive disciplinary enclave but rather to open up the possibilities of a responsible knowing. Using Kathryn Addelson’s work on professional knowing I argue that the collective activity that constitutes health psychology can be made more explicit not only by devising reflexive theories and practices but by focusing on what the outcomes of that activity might be. Functional theories of health and illness, on the other hand, obscure our epistemological and moral commitments.

Key Words: epistemology • health and illness • moral commitment • theory

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 273-283 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/135910530000500309


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Cornish Let's Get Real (with a Small `r'): For a Health Psychology That Prioritizes the Concrete J Health Psychol, July 1, 2009; 14(5): 638 - 642. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J. Stam Physician, Heal Thyself: The Fate of the Professional cum Critic J Health Psychol, May 1, 2006; 11(3): 385 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Cherrington, K. Chamberlain, and J. Grixti Relocating Alcohol Advertising Research: Examining Socially Mediated Relationships with Alcohol J Health Psychol, March 1, 2006; 11(2): 209 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Boyle, S. Smith, and L.-M. Liao Adult Genital Surgery for Intersex: A Solution to What Problem? J Health Psychol, July 1, 2005; 10(4): 573 - 584. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Howarth, J. Foster, and N. Dorrer Exploring the Potential of the Theory of Social Representations in Community-Based Health Research--and Vice Versa? J Health Psychol, March 1, 2004; 9(2): 229 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Yaskowich and H. J. Stam Cancer Narratives and the Cancer Support Group J Health Psychol, November 1, 2003; 8(6): 720 - 737. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Prilleltensky and O. Prilleltensky Towards a Critical Health Psychology Practice J Health Psychol, March 1, 2003; 8(2): 197 - 210. [Abstract] [PDF]