Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, P.
Right arrow Articles by Maclachlan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, P.
Right arrow Articles by Maclachlan, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Adjustment to an Artificial Limb: A Qualitative Perspective

Pamela Gallagher

Malcolm Maclachlan

Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

The purpose of this study was to identify factors considered to be important in the adjustment to amputation and the wearing of a prosthetic limb from the perspective of the person who has had a lower limb amputation. Hence, focus group methodology was employed as a means of acquiring perspectives within a population of young adults who had a lower limb amputation. Preliminary thematic analysis revealed that factors such as self-image, social, physical and practical concerns, the meaning attributed to and the acceptance of the amputation and support among others were important in the adjustment process. These findings have substantial implications for directing future research.

Key Words: adjustment • amputation • focus groups • prostheses

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 85-100 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/135910530100600107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
N. Warren and L. Manderson
Constructing Hope: Dis/continuity and the Narrative Construction of Recovery in the Rehabilitation Unit
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2008; 37(2): 180 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
C. D. Murray
The Social Meanings of Prosthesis Use
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2005; 10(3): 425 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]