Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eiser, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eiser, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Participation in Cervical Screening as a Function of Perceived Risk, Barriers and need for Cognitive Closure

J. Richard Eiser

University of Sheffield, UK, j.r.eiser{at}shef.ac.uk

Nicola Cole

Goldsmith’s College, University of London, UK

Questionnaires concerning cervical screening behaviour and attitudes were completed by a convenience sample of 70 female students aged 20-25 years. Based on the Prochaska-DiClemente definitions of ‘stages of change’, participants were classified into precontemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance groups according to their previous and intended screening behaviour. On average, participants rated their relative risk of personally contracting cervical cancer in the future to be below average, an apparent example of optimistic bias (p > .001). This was unrelated to their knowledge of behavioural risk factors or to their previous or intended screening behaviour. Linear trends were observed across the four groups in terms of perceived barriers to screening (precontemplators perceiving most barriers, p > .001) and on the Webster-Kruglanski measure of need for cognitive closure (precontemplators reporting lowest need, p > .01). The relationship between need for closure and stages of change appeared to be mediated by perceived barriers. It is argued that an understanding of psychological factors in screening should attend to differences in the extent to which individuals wish to reduce uncertainty about their own risk status, and their expectations concerning the screening processes.

Key Words: attitudes • cervical screening • cognitive closure • perceived risk • stages of change

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 99-105 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1359105302007001657


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. A.V. Marlow, J. Waller, and J. Wardle
The Impact of Human Papillomavirus Information on Perceived Risk of Cervical Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2009; 18(2): 373 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]