Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macleod, R.
Right arrow Articles by Booth, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Macleod, R.
Right arrow Articles by Booth, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patients’ Perceptions of What Makes Genetic Counselling Effective: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Rhona Macleod

St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK

David Craufurd

St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK

Katie Booth

University of Manchester, UK

Little is known about what makes for effective genetic counselling. Helping counselees adjust to their genetic situation is highlighted as a goal in most definitions of genetic counselling, but the processes involved in this are less clear. The current investigation focused on counselees’ perceptions of their genetic consultation as a possible influence on adjustment. Participants were all attending a Regional Genetics Clinic in the UK for the first time and were being seen for a variety of reasons. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Being seen by an ‘expert’ was seen as a positive aspect of attending the genetics clinic and one that was associated with receiving full information. The perception that either they, or the doctor, were able actively to do something about their situation, helped to relieve feelings of vulnerability. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the way genetic counselling is conducted.

Key Words: adjustment control • genetic counselling • interpretative phenomenological analysis

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 145-156 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1359105302007002454


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
M. McAllister, K. Payne, R. MacLeod, S. Nicholls, Dian Donnai, and L. Davies
Patient Empowerment in Clinical Genetics Services
J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 895 - 905.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
O. Barr and R. McConkey
A different type of appointment: the experiences of parents who have children with intellectual disabilities referred for genetic investigation
Journal of Research in Nursing, November 1, 2007; 12(6): 637 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
E. Chapman and J. A. Smith
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and the New Genetics
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2002; 7(2): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]