Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcallister, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mcallister, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Predictive Genetic Testing and Beyond: A Theory of Engagement

Marion Mcallister

Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, UK

This article presents a tentative grounded theory, which can provide some explanation of variation in behaviour around predictive genetic testing (PGT) for Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), based on interviews with individuals (n = 55) from families with a clinical diagnosis of HNPCC, 12 of whom were followed through the PGT protocol. The theory is built around a core category of engagement, a newly constructed concept reflecting the degree of cognitive and emotional involvement with cancer risk in individuals from these families, and models the psychosocial process of engaging with cancer risk. The degree of engagement at the time of testing can explain variations in approaches and reactions to PGT. A series of social factors, many related to the experiences of family life, emerged as either facilitating or blocking the process of engaging with cancer risk; a series of psychological factors emerged as interacting in a recursive, dynamic manner with each other and with engagement status. The degree of engagement can change with the unfolding of time and events in family life. The theory of engagement (TE) provides an explanatory framework for understanding behaviour related to PGT for HNPCC, and can potentially be applied to research on risk perception in the social sciences more generally. In addition, the theory may have potential uses in the genetics clinic, in identifying individuals at risk of adverse reactions to PGT for cancer, thus enabling better targeting of genetic counselling resources.

Key Words: engagement • genetic testing • grounded theory • HNPCC • risk perception

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 5, 491-508 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1359105302007005628
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nurs Sci QHome page
R. J. Hamilton and B. J. Bowers
The Theory of Genetic Vulnerability: A Roy Model Exemplar
Nurs Sci Q, July 1, 2007; 20(3): 254 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. Santos
The diversity of everyday ideas about inherited disorders
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2006; 15(3): 259 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
S. D. Taylor
Predictive Genetic Test Decisions for Huntington's Disease: Elucidating the Test/No-test Dichotomy
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2005; 10(4): 597 - 612.
[Abstract] [PDF]