Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McTavish, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McTavish, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafson, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cultural Differences in Use of an Electronic Discussion Group

Fiona M. McTavish

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, fmctavish{at}uhsra.wisc.edu

Suzanne Pingree

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

Robert Hawkins

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

David Gustafson

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

This article describes how 121 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer used a computer mediated discussion group to cope with their diagnosis. These data are part of a larger data set from a randomized clinical trial assessing the impact of a computer-based system called CHESS (the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System) on health outcomes. The larger study found significant improvement in health outcomes for those in the experimental group (those receiving CHESS), especially for women of color. Since discussion group is by far the most heavily used service of CHESS, one might conclude that these benefits (both overall and greater for women of color) should be attributed to amount of discussion group use. This study looks at how women of color and Caucasian women used the CHESS discussion group over the period of the study. Content analysis of messages in the discussion group showed that women of color used the discussion group differently from Caucasian women—they used it less frequently but their messages were more focused on breast cancer, suggesting they used discussion group more instrumentally.

Key Words: breast cancer • computers • digital divide • quality of life • social support

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 105-117 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1359105303008001447
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
B. R. Shaw, J. Y. Han, T. Baker, J. Witherly, R. P. Hawkins, F. McTavish, and D. H. Gustafson
How women with breast cancer learn using interactive cancer communication systems
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2007; 22(1): 108 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
B. Shaw, D. H. Gustafson, R. Hawkins, F. McTavish, H. McDowell, S. Pingree, and D. Ballard
How Underserved Breast Cancer Patients Use and Benefit From eHealth Programs: Implications for Closing the Digital Divide
American Behavioral Scientist, February 1, 2006; 49(6): 823 - 834.
[Abstract] [PDF]