This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Buchanan-Barrow, E. Articles by Bati, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buchanan-Barrow, E. Articles by Bati, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Children’s Understanding of Illness: the Generalization of Illness According to Exemplar

eithne.buchanan-barrow{at}surrey.ac.uk

Martyn Barrett

Mariangela Bati

University of Surrey, UK

Using children’s naïve theory of biology as a framework, this study examined children’s illness conceptions. Children (aged 4–11), presented with one of four exemplars (child, dog, duck or rosebush) suffering an imaginary illness, were asked whether various entities from six categories, biological and non-biological, could also be afflicted. The children’s illness generalizations differentiated between all of the categories; they not only distinguished between living and non-living things, but also recognized biological subkinds. Furthermore, the children’s generalizations were significantly greater to the category of exemplar, indicating that human prototypicality is not the sole basis for children’s generalizations. It is concluded that children’s understanding of illness is mediated by a naïve biological theory that facilitates their systematic predictions of susceptibility to illness.

Key Words: biology • children • illness • naïve theory

Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 6, 659-670 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13591053030086001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?